From The Right Coast
Politics, Current Affairs, News, History, Satire, Sports and Entertainment From a Liberal Democratic Perspective
Pages
- Home
- Rik Schneider
- TFS Daily
- The Latest Post
- The FreeState
- WordPress
- The New Democrat
- The Daily Review
- The Action Blog
- The Daily Post
- Classical Liberals and Classical Liberalism
- The New Left in America
- Classical Conservatives and Conservatism
- Nationalists and Christian-Conservatives: The New Right in America
- The Richard M. Nixon Page
- The Ronald W. Reagan Page
- The History Page
- The Big Government Page
- The Current Affairs Page
- TFS Politics: The Political Page
Monday, November 19, 2012
Right Coast: 'We’re Heading for Economic Dictatorship'
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Washington Times: Robert Knight: 'Casting Blame at Religious Conservatives For Mitt Romney's Defeat'
![]() |
| Source:The Washington Times- Well, the Republican Party used to be the GOP, anyway. |
"Like clockwork, traditional-values voters are being blamed for the failure of a moderate GOP presidential candidate.
This is the predictable consensus of liberal pundits but also some prominent conservatives. Never mind exit polls showing that conservative evangelical Protestants and devout Catholics combined gave Mitt Romney a higher percentage of their votes than George W. Bush in 2004 or John McCain in 2008. Somehow, it’s their fault that Mr. Romney lost.
In The Washington Post’s Sunday Outlook section, consultant Craig Shirley actually argued that because the GOP platform calls for a constitutional marriage amendment, “Obama now apparently holds the more correct conservative position on the marriage issue.”
From The Washington Times
Washington Times: Tim Devaney: 'Senate Finance Committee Economist Calls For 'Super Duper Committee'
![]() |
| Source:The Washington Times- columnist Tim Devaney. |
"After the supercommittee’s failure in 2011, the Senate Finance Committee’s chief economist suggested this week Congress may turn to a new “Super Duper Committee,” in an effort to avoid the fiscal cliff, with dire consequences that are too big to fail.
“The supercommittee was like a can with nails, and we kicked it down the road,” Jeff Wrase, chief economist of the Senate Finance Committee, said on Friday. “Now, we have to construct an exploding can, so no one can kick it down the road again.”
The fiscal cliff is a series of massive spending cuts and tax hikes that take a drastic approach to reducing the deficit, which would hurt economic growth. The Obama administration and Senate Democrats have struggled to negotiate with House Republicans over a more reasonable solution to reducing the deficit."
From The Washington Times
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Arcturus Reagan Designee: William Mcllhany Interviewing Christopher Story-: Communist Long Range Takeover Deception Strategy
![]() |
| Source:Arcturus Reagan Designee- William Mcllhany interviewing Christopher Story. |
"Christopher Story - The Perestroika Deception (The McIlhany Report)
Since 1989 the world has been told that the Soviet Union collapsed and that, except for several countries, Communism is dead and the U.S. won the cold war.
The reality is quite the reverse. Everything we have seen since 1989 has been a massive and successful, multi-decade long deception strategy on the part of the KGB, the Soviet secret police.
The Goal? To deceive the West and achieve the goal of Leninist strategy - a totalitarian world government or international police state.
We know this from the evidence provided by Anatoly Golitsyn the most important defector from the KGB who came to America in 1961. In 1980 he wrote a book, "New Lies for Old," published in 1984, which described the disinformation strategy and made specific predictions as to what the KGB would do, such as removing the Berlin Wall, changing the name of the KGB and other structures and the role played by Mikhail Gorbachev."
Source:Arcturus Reagan Designee
This is a conspiracy theory if I've ever heard one. The idea that the United States and the brand new Federal Republic of Russia would set out to rule the world together, instead of America and Russia being enemies and trying to rule the world by themselves, is nonsense. (To be generous)
This is a conspiracy theory if I've ever heard one. The idea that the United States and the brand new Federal Republic of Russia would set out to rule the world together, instead of America and Russia being enemies and trying to rule the world by themselves, is nonsense. (To be generous)
First of all, America is not an occupying power. We've never set out to occupy other nations and force them to live like us. (Except for perhaps Iraq and Vietnam)) When we defeated Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan during World War II, we were only there until they were able to govern themselves again, after we destroyed the government's there. And as messy as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been, we are leaving both of those countries by 2014 and turning over complete control to the people in both countries to govern.
As far as Russia, the Soviets left Afghanistan in a complete mess economically and militarily. One of the reasons why Russia lost so many of their republics, the Baltic's and Caucus's, as well as Ukraine. And they were in no position by the time Boris Yeltzin became President of the Federal Republic to occupy anyone.
Russia twenty years later even though they are no way complete in being a democracy (liberal or socialist) and still has a lot of things they need to work on, politically and economically, are much better off than they have ever been. The Russian people are better off economically and have more freedom social and economically than they've ever had under the Putin Administration. But are in no position to be occupying anyone, even though they are on course to becoming an economic and military world power again, but this is no longer Soviet Russia.
Russia twenty years later even though they are no way complete in being a democracy (liberal or socialist) and still has a lot of things they need to work on, politically and economically, are much better off than they have ever been. The Russian people are better off economically and have more freedom social and economically than they've ever had under the Putin Administration. But are in no position to be occupying anyone, even though they are on course to becoming an economic and military world power again, but this is no longer Soviet Russia.
The John Birch Society and other right-wing Nationalists, really should be in Hollywood and New York producing and writing fiction. Even though culturally they wouldn't fit in well in either community. Seeing minorities as invaders and wondering why women are free and not slaves for their men. (Ha, ha) They've never been taken seriously a mainstream media and documentary organization, because they produce so many far out theories that you almost have to be a mental patient to be qualified to take them seriously.
Friday, November 16, 2012
Washington Times: U.S. Senator Rand Paul: 'Ron Paul Revolution: GOP’s Last Best Hope, How To Save The GOP'
![]() |
| Source:The Washington Times- U.S. Representative Ron Paul (Libertarian, Texas) is retiring from the House, at the end of this Congress. |
"Some argue that Ron Paul was never relevant, that he was simply a gadfly who never accomplished anything legislatively. Others, myself included, argue that maybe, just maybe, the Ron Paul Revolution is the last best hope for saving the GOP from oblivion.
As I walk through airports, ride in taxis and meet people in large cities — people of color, working-class people, people with tattoos, people in overalls, people with piercings and even, at times, people in suits — I am amazed at the diversity of folks who come up and say how much they admire Ron Paul.
At rallies around the country, from the liberal bastion of Berkeley, Calif., where 8,000 students came to an event, to Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University, kids from all over the political spectrum came to listen to Ron Paul."
The naysayers will point out: “He didn’t even win a primary.” This is true, but when polled directly against President Obama, Ron Paul ran neck-and-neck with an interesting demographic. In the heat of the campaign, a Feb. 28 Rasmussen poll showed him leading Mr. Obama, winning the independent vote, taking a significant part of the Democratic vote and losing a significant part of the Republican vote. He truly attracted voters across the political divide from both parties and from independents.
His colleagues in Congress would ask with envy, “How do you raise so much money from the youth? From the Internet?” The truth was much more revealing. College students, welders, carpenters, maids, blacks, whites and Hispanics latched onto Ron Paul’s unique message of fiscal conservatism, personal privacy and liberty and a less bellicose foreign policy, one of taking care of things at home before sending our soldiers and our money abroad. It is and was the message that attracted the youth, the message that combined the fiscal conservatism and limited constitutional government of Republicans and a more restrained foreign policy sometimes exhibited by Democrats."
You can read the rest of Senator Rand Paul's column, at The Washington Times
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Seth Mandel: 'What Mitt Romney Calls “Gifts,” Voters Call Solutions'
![]() |
| Source:Commentary Magazine- columnist Seth Mandel. |
"Obama reelection campaign’s impressive turnout and get-out-the-vote strategy took the president’s Republican opponents by surprise. But it appears to also be teaching Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan an incomplete, if not totally wrong, lesson about their loss to President Obama. Earlier this week, Ryan told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that “urban” turnout was key [...]/p"
From Commentary Magazine
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Right Coast: 'A Changing America'
From Right Coast
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
%20-%20Google%20Search.png)


%20-%20Google%20Search.png)
