Liberal Democracy

Liberal Democracy
The Free State

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Sean Hannity: 'Maybe it’s Time For a New Conservative Party’

Source:Freedoms Lighthouse- right-wing radio talk show host Sean Hannity.
Source:The FreeState

"Sean Hannity reacting to the GOP Establishment's apparent decision to capitulate to Obama and the Democrats on both the Government Shutdown and the Debt Limit increase." 


"Time for a new political party", when was the last time someone said that? Perhaps 5 minutes ago and I just haven't had time to catch it. 

Perhaps the main difference other than not being in leadership and having a real seat at the negotiating table, but one of the main differences between being in the establishment, (an adult in the room) whether you are talking about a political party or any other major organization, that's made up of different philosophical factions in it, like a large political party and being a radical whose looking in (because you are not even allowed in the room) is that leadership has to govern and get things done. 

Because leadership has to govern, they get to make deals and work things out with people that they wouldn't normally choose to have to work with. Like Republican leaders negotiating with Democratic leaders, the latest debt ceiling and government shutdown being the latest example of that. 

Whereas the radical (right or left) at the end of the day doesn't has to govern. They don't even have to vote. They can make all the crazy statements that they want and raise as much money and get as much free airtime as they want (especially if they're not trying to become a party leader) and it doesn't make a bit of difference. Their party leadership already thinks that they're crazy, irresponsible, and perhaps drunk and high as well. And their base just loves them even more, perhaps because they seem crazy, irresponsible, drunk, and high, but only all the time.

What the Sean Hannity's of the world apparently still don't understand, is that the Republican Party has less political power today, than they did even a year ago. Fewer seats in the House, perhaps more competitive seats on their side, especially because of the Tea Party government shutdown. 

The Democratic Party has a reelected President in Barack Obama, who doesn't have to worry about his next election, because he just had his last one. And a Democratic Senate with 55 seats, with all 55 members and perhaps even a few Republicans even before the shutdown ended, who wants the shutdown over because they think shutting down the government and risking a government default, over ObamaCare, is mind bogglingly stupid. Something that could get them nominated to the National Morons Convention. (If there is such a thing) 

But again, Sean Hannity is a radical who doesn't have any seat in government at all, let alone at the negotiating table and is free to say whatever the hell he wants too, because at the end of the day it doesn't matter.

MLB: MLB 1979- This Week in Baseball

Source:MLB- The Mystery Man from one of the commercials.

Source:The Daily Post

“1979 08 07 This Week in Baseball” 

From MLB 

Montreal Expos catcher Gary Carter being interviewed for one the segments from This Week in Baseball, during this August, 1979 episode of that series. A real exciting interview with too much information. He gave away the whole store when he said that if the Expos continue to play well and stay healthy, they could win the NL East. I almost threw up my lunch when I heard that. LOL

Source:MLB- Montreal Expos catcher Gary Carter.
1979, is still one of the best seasons in Major League Baseball and another example of why MLB should’ve went with the wildcard playoff format much earlier than they did, which was 1995. You had three teams that won 90 or more games in the AL East alone. 

The Orioles, Red Sox and Milwaukee Brewers. The Yankees, won 89 games, but had a better record than the Anaheim Angels, that won the AL West. But because of no wildcard and that only division winners qualified for the playoffs, the Yankees didn’t qualify. The Orioles, were the only team in the AL East that made the playoffs in 79. Even though four AL East teams won 89 or more games.

In the AL West, the Angels won the division with 88 win. Their first division championship ever. And two clubs in the Kansas City Royals and Texas Rangers that battled them for that division. 

The NL East, you have a very good divisional race as well. With Pirates winning that division, who won several division championships in the 1970s and won two MLB World Series as well. The Montreal Expos, who up until the late 70s, were consistent losers, made a strong run at the NL East, but finished three games back of the Pirates. The Expos, were actually very good in the late 1970s and early 80s and even the early and mid 1990s. But only made the NL Playoffs once in this whole period, because they only won one division championship.

The NL West, only two teams with winning records, but two good teams in the Reds and Houston Astros. The Reds winning that division with 91 wins, with the Astros finishing a couple of games back. In 1979, you had three great division races. 

The AL West, NL East and NL West and even though the Orioles won the AL East by seven games, they also won 102 games that year. And we’re in a division with two other clubs that were good enough to be very good playoff teams, that won 90 or more games as well. And the Yankees, again if they were in the AL West, would’ve won that division. 

MLB, was behind the times back then and should’ve expanded their playoff format much sooner than they did.