Politics, Current Affairs, News, History, Satire, Sports and Entertainment From a Liberal Democratic Perspective
Pages
- Home
- Rik Schneider
- TFS Daily
- The Latest Post
- The FreeState
- WordPress
- The New Democrat
- The Daily Review
- The Action Blog
- The Daily Post
- Classical Liberals and Classical Liberalism
- The New Left in America
- Classical Conservatives and Conservatism
- Nationalists and Christian-Conservatives: The New Right in America
- The Richard M. Nixon Page
- The Ronald W. Reagan Page
- The History Page
- The Big Government Page
- The Current Affairs Page
- TFS Politics: The Political Page
Friday, January 2, 2015
Roger Sharp Archive: Talking to Jack Ruby's Lawyers (1963)
Source:The New Democrat
The Jack Ruby case had to been fascinating and one of those cases that I bet just about any hard-working good defense lawyer would want to take. Because it was not clear if Ruby was guilty of actual murder, at least not first degree murder and for at least a couple of reasons. One, Ruby didn’t kill and innocent person. He killed Lee Harvey Oswald, but he killed the man who assassinated President John F. Kennedy. It is clear now and perhaps even when Ruby Killed Oswald, that Oswald at the very least had something to do with the JFK assassination. Not saying Ruby is innocent here, just saying it is not first degree murder. And I believe you could’ve easily of gotten it down to second degree murder, twenty-five to life. Or first degree manslaughter is twenty-years, twenty to life. And you could’ve made a pretty good case for temporary insanity on Jack Ruby’s part.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)